EFTA01189737.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 970.9 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 18 pages
MAYER•BROWN
Everyone There
Will Have Moved
Here!
An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189737
By Mark Leeds and Gabriel Hernandez
Mark Leeds is a tax partner with the New York office of Mayer Brown and the editor-in-chief
of Derivatives: Financial Products Report, as well as a frequent writer on Capital Markets tax
issues. Gabriel Hernandez is a tax partner with the San Juan office of BDO Puerto Rico and
one of the framers of the Puerto Rico incentives. The authors thank Anthony Tuths, a New
York tax partner with Withum Smith & Brown, PC, for his helpful comments and
suggestions.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE. Any advice expressed below as to tax matters was neither written nor intended by Mayer Brown LLP to be
used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed under US tax law.
•
EFTA01189738
The play West Side Story focuses on the challenges occasioned by the mid-
twentieth century migration of significant numbers of Puerto Rican families to
New York City. The plight depicted in the theater was real; the economic situation
at the time in Puerto Rico was dire. The government of Puerto Rico, seeking to
stem mass emigration, responded with a mix of tax and economic incentives.'
The response to these tax incentives over the next three decades was spectacular.
Puerto Rico was transformed from an impoverished agrarian economy to a
2
technologically advanced industrial country.
The Federal income tax subsidies supporting Puerto Rico were repealed in 1994.
The impact on the economy of Puerto Rico was substantial.3 These changes,
coupled with a rise in inexpensive labor elsewhere in the world, caused a
prolonged recession in Puerto Rico and the emigration of some of Puerto Rico's
best and brightest young people began again. Today, La Isla del Encanto is
making bold moves to attempt to reverse its negative economic trends and bring
individuals (including Puerto Rican nationals who may have left many years
before), families, and businesses back to its economy:* The Puerto Rican
Department of Economic Development and Commerce (the "DEDC") has been
actively engaged in an information campaign extolling the benefits of relocating
one's business and residence to Puerto Rico. This article explores certain US
Federal and Puerto Rican income tax considerations for individuals who may
wish to consider relocating to Puerto Rico.
At the current time, the success of Puerto Rico's new laws remains uncertain, but
reports suggest that the opportunity is attracting attention.6 As analyzed below,
however, the Puerto Rican tax incentives must be understood in light of existing
US rules, which are very effective in ensuring the integrity of the US tax system
on built-in gains and investment income. Concomitantly, Congress has
recognized the need for special tax incentives to assist US possessions, including
Puerto Rico, in obtaining jobs.? The need for special tax incentives has been
attributed to the additional costs imposed by possession status, such as the
requirement to use US flagships and the minimum wage standards. These policy
statements were reaffirmed by Congress in May 2012.8
Overview of 2O13 and Future Tax Burdens on US Individuals
At the end of 2012, the House of Representatives followed the Senate in passing
H.R. 8, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the "Act"). President Obama
IMYEREIROWN I 1
EFTA01189739
signed this legislation into law on January 2, 2013. Succinctly stated, the Act
imposed an income tax increase on top-earning US taxpayers, nudged up the
estate tax rate to a maximum of 40% (from 35%), and extended a variety of tax
incentives that either had already expired or were set to expire. Tax rates on top-
earning individual US taxpayers went up by a significant amount, but triggered
beginning at $400,000. Specifically, for individuals with incomes over
$400,000, beginning in 2013, the highest marginal rate was permanently
increased to 39.6%. In addition, the Act imposed a stiff marriage penalty—
married couples filing jointly with combined incomes of $450,000 are subject to
the 39.6% rate. For low and moderate income taxpayers, the Act retained the
existing rate structure.
The Act, however, does not use the $400,000 ($450,000 for married taxpayers
filing jointly) thresholds for all purposes. Specifically, the phase-outs for itemized
deductions and personal exemptions apply at adjusted gross incomes of
$250,000 for individuals and $300,000 for joint returns. Also, the Pease
limitation on itemized deductions has been reinstated. The Pease limitation
reduces most itemized deductions by 3% of the amount by which adjusted gross
income exceeds a specified threshold, up to a maximum reduction of 80% of
itemized deductions. The thresholds are also going to be adjusted for inflation
beginning in 2014. The federal income tax rate on long-term capital gains was
increased from 15% to 20% for individuals with incomes of $400,000 or more
($450,000 for married couples filing jointly) beginning in 2013. Qualified
dividend income remains taxable at the rates applicable to long-term capital
gains, and thus at the 20% rate applicable to taxpayers with income of at least
$400,000 ($450,000 for married couples). Capital gains and other items of net
investment income can also be subject to a 3.8% Medicare Tax beginning in 2013.
Notwithstanding these substantial tax increases on individuals with incomes over
$400,000, President Obama has been pressing Congress to consider additional
"revenue options."9 The 2013 federal income tax increases, coupled with the
prospects for additional tax increases in the near term, has increased the
attractiveness of jurisdictions with more moderate tax burdens. As discussed
below, Puerto Rico is such a place—at least for the time being. Puerto Rico offers
the additional advantage of US citizens not being required to give up their US
citizenship.i°
2I Everyone There Will Have Moved Here!: An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189740
The Puerto Rican Tax Rules for US Individuals Who Become
Residents of Puerto Rico
In January 2012, Puerto Rico passed Act No. 22 of 2012 ("Act No. 22"). Act No.
22 contains numerous incentives to encourage individuals to relocate to Puerto
Rico. The law provides the following benefits to new Puerto Rico bonafide
residents on qualified investments (more on who qualifies as a new bonafide
resident below): (i) 100% tax exemption from Puerto Rico income taxes on all
dividends; (ii) 100% tax exemption from Puerto Rico income taxes on all interest;
and (iii) 100% tax exemption from Puerto Rico income taxes on all long-term
capital gains accrued after the individual becomes a bonafide resident of Puerto
Rico. The new resident must not have been a resident of Puerto Rico at any time
during the 15-year period preceding the effective date of Act No. 22, which period
would be from January 16, 1997 through January 16, 2012.
Other complementary laws were enacted in 2012, mainly:
I. The Export Services Act (Act 20 of 2012), which provides for 4%
maximum tax rate on income related to services for exportation provided
by new Export Services businesses in Puerto Rico.
2. The International Financial Center Regulatory Act (Act 273 of 2012),
with the objective of making Puerto Rico an international banking and
financial center by providing tax incentives (mainly, a 4% income tax
rate) for new banking and financial activity in Puerto Rico that is done
for clients outside of Puerto Rico.
There is a process in place whereby an individual files an application for a Puerto
Rico tax decree prior to relocation which would serve as a contract guaranteeing
the incentives through 2035 from any subsequent changes in local legislation. It
should be noted that these efforts are not dissimilar to the Federal government
allocating tax credits to stimulate certain types of economic activity (recent
examples being renewable energy initiatives), or what states have often done:
providing tax holidays to companies to move their factories.
US Individuals Who Become Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
In general, a US individual remains subject to full Federal income tax regardless
of where (s)he is domiciled." The US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code"), however, provides special rules for an "individual who is a bonafide
MAYERBROWN I3
EFTA01189741
resident" of Puerto Rico.12 Under these special rules, income from sources within
Puerto Rico is not included in gross income and is not subject to US federal
13
income tax. Thus, there are two levels of inquiries for US individuals who
relocate to Puerto Rico. First, is the individual a bona fide resident of Puerto
Rico? If so, what items of income can be included in his or her Puerto Rican
income and thereby excluded from US income?
BONA FIDE RESIDENTS OF PUERTO RICO
An individual is considered to be a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico if three tests
are met. The first test is mostly mechanical. The individual must be present for at
least 183 days during the taxable year in Puerto Rico (the "presence test"),I4
Second, the individual must not have a tax home outside of Puerto Rico during
the taxable year.I5 Third, the individual must not have a "closer connection" to
the United States or a foreign country than to Puerto Rico during the taxable
16
year. Special rules are provided for the year of the move from the United States
to Puerto Rico.
The Presence Test
The mechanical 183-day presence test is loosened by Treasury Regulations.
Under these regulations, an individual will be considered to meet the presence
I7
test if one of five tests is met:
I. The individual was present in Puerto Rico for at least 183 days during the
taxable year;
2. The individual was present in Puerto Rico for at least 549 days during the
3-year period consisting of the current taxable year and two immediately
preceding taxable years, provided that the individual was present in
Puerto Rico for at least 60 days during each of those years;18
3. The individual was present in the United States for no more than 90 days
during the taxable year;
4. During the taxable year, the individual had earned income (meaning
wages, salary, professional fees and compensation for personal services
actually rendered) of less than $3,000 and was present for more days in
Puerto Rico than the United States; or
5. The individual had no significant connection to the United States during
the taxable year.
0I Everyone There Will Have Moved Here!: An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189742
The importance of keeping a diary to establish presence cannot be
9
underestimated. In addition, a taxpayer should pay for personal items with a
credit card. The credit card statement can be used to establish his or her
whereabouts on a given day.
Detailed rules are provided for undertaking the day count necessary to determine
compliance with the presence test. An individual is considered present on any
day that (s)he is physically present in Puerto Rico (no minimum amount of time
20
during that day must be satisfied) An individual is considered present in
Puerto Rico even if (s)he is outside of Puerto Rico to accompany "on a full-time
basis" a parent, spouse or child for certain medical treatment.21 Concomitantly, if
the individual is present in the United States because (s)he accompanied a
parent, spouse or child to the US for specified medical care, his or her presence in
the US for such purpose is not counted as a day spent in the United States.22 In
addition, an individual is considered to be in Puerto Rico (x) if his or her ability to
return to Puerto Rico is prevented due to a major disaster or (y) during a period
23
in which an evacuation order is in effect for the individual's home. Under a tie-
breaker rule, if an individual is present in the United States and Puerto Rico on
the same day, that day is counted as a day present in Puerto Rico.24
As noted above, even if an individual fails each of the four mechanical presence
tests, (s)he can still satisfy the presence test if (s)he has no significant connection
to the US An individual is considered to have a significant connection to the
25
United States if one of three tests are met:
I. The individual has a permanent home in the US;
2. The individual has a current voter registration in any political
subdivision of the US; or
3. The individual has a spouse or child under the age of IS whose principal
place of residence is in the United States unless the child is living in the
US with a custodial parent under a custodial decree or the child is in the
US as a student.
A permanent home includes a furnished room or an apartment that may be either
owned or rented.26 If the place is not occupied for long durations (as opposed to
short durations), it is considered a permanent home. Special rules for long
durations are provided for properties that the individual own but rents out.
Under these special rules, the rental property can be treated as a non-permanent
INWERBROWN I S
EFTA01189743
home if the taxpayer does not use any portion of it as a residence during the
taxable year.27
The Tax Home Test
Applicable regulations provide that a person's tax home is considered to be
located at his or her "regular or principal place of business."2R If, due to the
nature of an individual's occupation (or because the individual does not carry on
a trade or business), the individual does not have a regular or principal place of
29
business, then the person's tax home is his or her regular place of residence. A
tax home must be maintained for the entire taxable year."
As can readily be seen, in order for an individual to be successful in establishing
that (s)he is a bona fi de resident of Puerto Rico, that person must relocate a
substantial portion of his or her business activities to Puerto Rico. In the context
of investment management activities, it is likely that satisfaction of this test
would require a migration of a substantial portion of the trading and research
functions to Puerto Rico. Since the test does not require places of business to be
located outside of Puerto Rico, it should be possible to locate middle- and back-
office functions outside of Puerto Rico and still satisfy the tax home test. In
addition, if an individual desires to retain a US residence following the move to
Puerto Rico, the tax home test should not prohibit such a retention, provided that
the principal business office is related to Puerto Rico. As discussed immediately
below, however, such a choice may bear on whether the individual has satisfied
the closer connection test.
The Closer Connection Test
The closer connection test is a facts and circumstance test. Specifically, an
individual is considered to have a closer connection to Puerto Rico than
elsewhere if (s)he maintains more significant contacts with Puerto Rico than the
United States.31 Nine non-exclusive factors are listed as relevant to the
determination as to whether an individual maintains a closer connection to
32
Puerto Rico than elsewhere:
(i) The location of the individual's permanent home (determined
in the same manner as under the presence test33);
(ii) The location of the individual's family;
6I Everyone There Will Have Moved Here!: An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bono Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189744
(iii) The location of personal belongings, such as automobiles,
furniture, clothing and jewelry owned by the individual and his
or her family;34
(iv) The location of social, political, cultural or religious
organizations with which the individual has a current
relationship;
(v) The location where the individual conducts his or her routine
personal banking activities;
(vi) The location where the individual conducts business activities
(other than those that constitute the individual's tax home);
(vii) The location of the jurisdiction in which the individual holds a
driver's license;
(viii) The location of the jurisdiction in which the individual votes;
and
(ix) The country of residence designated by the individual on forms
and documents.
In addition, an individual must be considered to possess a closer connection to
Puerto Rico than to the United States or a foreign country for the entire taxable
year.
An example illustrates the application of the closer connection test to an
investment manager.35 In the example, a fund manager with two teenage children
in high school relocates to Puerto Rico, but his wife and children remain in the
36
US to complete high school. The manager regularly travels back to the US to
visit his wife and children, conduct business and take vacations. While he rents
an apartment in Puerto Rico, he co•owns a home in the US with his wife where
she and their children live. The manager joins the Puerto Rico Chamber of
Commerce, but has current social, political, cultural and religious affiliations in
the US, receives personal correspondence in the US, including brokerage and
bank statements. He also has substantial personal effects at the US residence,
remains registered to vote in the US and holds a US driver's license. On these
facts, the example concludes that the fund manager has a closer connection to the
US.
MAYERBROWN I7
EFTA01189745
For individuals concerned about satisfaction of the closer connection test, there is
an established body of law in an analogous area. The issue as to whether an
individual has a closer connection to Puerto Rico than the United States bears a
striking resemblance to the issue as to whether an individual who has relocated
from New York State remains subject to tax in New York on the basis that such
individual is a New York domiciliary. A person's domicile is the principal
37
establishment to which he intends to return whenever absent. New York courts
have addressed a substantial number of real-life issues presented by persons who
seek to change their domicile that have direct resonance on the closer connection
test:
I. Under New York law, an individual is not considered to have changed his
domicile by establishing significant ties to a new location if he continues
38
to maintain significant ties to New York.
2. If the individual retains the original home, (s)he should make substantial
efforts to sell such home because such efforts validate that the individual
intends to abandon the prior home.39 It may be possible to establish that
a former primary residence has become a vacation home or hotel
substitute, but this might be very difficult to prove in a given case.4°
3. If a business is maintained in the United States, the individual may be
considered to have a closer connection to the United States than Puerto
Rico if the individual maintains considerable and continuous contact
3l
with that business through telephone and electronic/computer contact
The NYS Audit Guidelines also note certain additional factors that would support
an individual's assertion that (s)he has a closer connection to Puerto Rico than
the United States. All invoices, financial data and correspondence should be
addressed to the Puerto Rico address. Safe-deposit boxes should not be
maintained in the United States, but should be maintained in Puerto Rico.
Automobile, boat and airplane registrations should show the Puerto Rico
address. Legal documents, such as wills and divorce decrees, should show the
Puerto Rico address of the individual who has redomiciled to Puerto Rico. The
NYS Guidelines treat the following items as "nonfactors" of domicile: (i) where a
will is probated, (ii) passive interests in partnerships, (iii) bank account locations,
(iv) contributions to political causes, and (v) where the individual's tax return is
prepared.
8I Everyone There Will Have Moved Here!: An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189746
CERTAIN SPECIAL RULES FOR THE YEAR OF THE MOVE TO PUERTO RICO
Special rules apply to determine whether the tax home test and the closer
connection test are satisfied during the taxable year during which the individual
relocates to Puerto Rico. An individual is eligible to take advantage of the special
02
rules if three tests are met. First, the individual must not have been a bona fide
resident of Puerto Rico during each of the three taxable years preceding the year
of the move. Second, during the second half of the year of the move, the
individual must not have had a tax home in, or closer connection to, the United
States or a foreign country than Puerto Rico. Last, the individual must be a bona
fide resident of Puerto Rico for each of the three years following the year of the
move to Puerto Rico. If each of these tests are met, the individual will be
considered to have satisfied the tax home and closer connection requirements for
the year of the relocation.
INCOME ELIGIBLE TO BE EXEMPT FROM UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
There seems to be a common misperception that once an individual has become a
bonafide resident of Puerto Rico, all income earned by such individual escapes
US federal income tax. The exception, however, is not this broad. Specifically,
Code § 933(1) limits the exemption to "income derived from sources with Puerto
Rico." Applicable regulations provide detailed rules on when income will be
43
considered to have been derived from Puerto Rican sources.
As a starting point—and luckily for tax practitioners—is that the normal source
rules contained in Code §§ 861 through 865 apply mutatis ????? tandis in
determining whether income is from sources within Puerto Rico. Accordingly, the
source of investment income, such as interest and dividends, retains its US-
source income status when paid by US corporations to a bonafide resident of
44
Puerto Rico. Since this income is US-source income, not Puerto Rican-source
income, it remains subject to full federal income tax in the hands of a bonafide
resident of Puerto Rico. In addition, even if investment income is derived in
connection with the conduct of a trade or business in Puerto Rico, such income
retains its character as US-source income.45 Allincome earned in connection with
the conduct of a trade or business in the United States is treated as US-source
46
income as well.
The source rules applicable to determining when income is derived from sources
within Puerto Rico also contain an anti-abuse rule in the form of an "anti-
MAYER BROWN 19
EFTA01189747
47
conduit" rule. Under the anti-conduit rule, if income is paid to a bonafide
resident of Puerto Rico from Puerto Rican sources and the payer of the income
(or another person) provides the same consideration to a third person in
exchange for US-source income, then the income paid to the bonafide resident of
Puerto Rico is not treated as Puerto Rican source income. For example, assume
that a bonafide resident of Puerto Rico ("A") provides services to a Puerto Rican
service recipient ("X"). X provides the same services to a US company ("Y") for
the same consideration that A pays to X, but provides the services in the United
States. Under these circumstances, the income that A derives from X will not be
considered to be Puerto Rican source income, even if all of the services provided
by A are within Puerto Rico.
While capital gains generally are not US-source income when recognized by a
nonresident not connected with the conduct of a US trade or business, to the
extent that such gains were built-in gains when the non-US person became a
bonafide resident of Puerto Rico and the disposition takes place within 10 years
of the individual becoming a bonafide resident of Puerto Rico, such gains remain
subject to US federal income tax." In general, the portion of the gain that is
treated as built-in gain is determined based upon the relative holding period of
the property.69 In the case of marketable securities, however, the portion of the
gain that is subject to US federal income is determined by using the closing price
of the securities on the first day of the possessions holding period (the date on
50
which the individual became a bonafide resident of Puerto Rico).
Savvy investors may attempt to manipulate the source rules by creating a Puerto
Rican corporation to hold investments. The idea here is that the dividends and
interest paid by the Puerto Rican corporation would be considered to be Puerto
Rican source income in the hands of the bonafide resident of Puerto Rico. There
are, however, substantial limitations on the ability to implement this strategy.
First, Puerto Rican corporations are treated as non-US corporations for federal
income tax purposes. As a result, dividends paid by US corporations to Puerto
Rican corporations are subject to a 10% (or 30%) withholding tax.5I The higher
withholding tax applies unless three conditions satisfied. Specifically, foreign
persons must hold less than 25% of the stock of the Puerto Rican corporation, at
least 65% of the income of the Puerto Rican corporation must be derived from the
conduct of a US trade or business, and no substantial part of the income of the
Puerto Rican corporation can be used to satisfy obligations to persons who are
52
not bonafide residents of Puerto Rico.
10 I Everyone There Will Have Moved Here!: An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189748
The US subpart F rules are coordinated with the exclusion for amounts paid to
bonafide residents of Puerto Rico. Under these coordination rules, a shareholder
of a Puerto Rican corporation cannot be treated as a "United States shareholder"
if the shareholder is a bonafide resident of Puerto Rico and a dividend paid by
the corporation would be treated as an item of Puerto Rican source income in the
hands of the shareholder.i3 While dividends paid by a Puerto Rican corporation
would be treated as Puerto Rican-source income under the normal source rule,
special source of income rules apply when the shareholder holds at least 10% of
the total voting stock of the Puerto Rican corporation.54 Under this special source
rule, the source of the dividend (and interest) is determined by reference to the
source of income of the payer corporation. For example, if only 50% of the
income of the Puerto Rican corporation was derived from sources within Puerto
Rico, then only 50% of the dividends paid by the corporation would be Puerto
Rican-source income. The "look-through" source rules do not apply if 80% of the
55
income of the corporation was derived from sources within Puerto Rico.
The Expatriation Rules Do Not Apply to a Relocation to Puerto Rico
Rules have been in place to prevent tax-motivated expatriations since 1966, when
Code § 877 was enacted. Code § 877 caused former US taxpayers who expatriated
for tax purposes to remain subject to US tax for a 10-year period. In addition,
over time, the rules have been modified several times in order to make it harder
and more expensive for people to exit the US tax net. In 1996, Congress enacted
what is now Code § 6039G which requires expatriates to identify themselves and
register with the IRS by filing IRS Form 8854 or be subject to US tax until they do
so. Finally, Congress enacted Code § 877A in 2008. This new section exacts a toll
charge at the time of expatriation. Code § 877A requires mark-to-market of
assets, and tax paid on the mark-to-market gain upon expatriation. These rules
do not apply to a US individual who relocates to Puerto Rico.
Concluding Remarks
Puerto Rico Law 22 provides a clear Puerto Rican tax-incentive for investors to
consider the arduous process of relocating their personal life and business affairs
to Puerto Rico. The benefits of the new Puerto Rican tax regime, however, are
substantially tempered by the existing US rules which, except for income that is
derived from Puerto Rican sources and capital gains economically attributable to
MAYER BROWN Ill
EFTA01189749
the holding period during which the individual is a bona fide resident of Puerto
Rico, continue to apply to bona fide residents of Puerto Rico. Hopefully, these
extraordinary measures will assist Puerto Rico in its efforts to attract investors
and to rebuild the economy of "La Ida del Encanto." •
Endnotes
In response to the dire economic circumstances that led to massive emigration, the Puerto Rican
government launched "Operation Bootstrap" in 1948. This operation was designed to encourage private
business investment. both local and foreign, to accelerate the islands industrial development. Local tax
holidays were complemented by Federal income tax exemptions for US corporations operating in
Puerto Rico. Under section 931 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and successor Section 936 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. as amended (the "Code"). a US corporation that derived gross income
from the active conduct of a trade or business in Puerto Rico received a Federal income tax credit
which, in most cases, eliminated the Federal income tax otherwise due on those earnings. Also. Federal
income tax rules allowed the repatriation of those earnings to the US parent company without the
imposition of Federal income taxes.
2 By 1958. the gross product of Puerto Rico more than doubled. similarly for per capita income according
to Baer. Werner (1959) -Puerto Rico: An Evaluation of a Successful Development Program: The
Quarrerly JournalofEconomies. November 2013.
3 Code § 936 was repealed in 1994. US Government Accounting Office (2006. May). 2006 Puerto Rico
Fiscal Relations with the Federal Government and Economic Trends during the Phan-out of the
Possessions Tax Credit (Publication No. GA0-06-541).
4 L. Browning and J. Creswell. -Puerto Rico Creates Tax Shelters in Appeal to the Rich." The New York
Times Deaibook (March 25. 2013).
5 Marino. -Law 22 Attracting Millionaire Investors to Puerto Rico." Caribbean Business PR. Vol. 41. No.
II (March 28. 2013).
6 See Marino. "Puerto Rico Attracting Wealthy Investors. Service Finns" (reporting that 10 wealthy
individuals have moved to Puerto Rico since the law changes described herein). Caribbean Business
PR. Vol. 41. No. 9 (March 14.2013).
7 Joint Committee on Taxation. General Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (JCS-10-87). May 4.
1987. pp. 999-1000. available at http://wwwjet.gov/jcs-I0-87.pdf.
8 Joint Committee on Taxation. FEDERAL TAX LAW AND ISSUES RELATED TO THE UNITED
STATES TERRITORIES (JCX-41-12). May 14. 2012. p.24 available at
hups://www.jet.gov/publications.html?func= showdown&id=4427.
9 See enerally. Salant. "McCain Praising Obama Backs Revenue Compromise on Budget."
(March 23. 2013).
10 Under Code § 933. a US citizen who becomes a bonafi de resident of Puerto Rico (i.e.. changes domicile
to Puerto Rico) is not subject to Federal income tax on income from Puerto Rico sources. By contrast.
under Code § 877A. a US citizen who relinquishes his US citizenship could be subject to income tax on
the unrealized appreciation of his/her assets.
II US person includes a citizen or resident of the United States. Code § 7701(a)(30)(A).
12 See Code § 933(I) (rules for individuals who are bonafie residents of Puerto Rico for an entire taxable
year).
13 Id.
14 Code § 937(00).
12 I Everyone There Will Have Moved Here!: An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189750
15 Code 4 937(aX2).
16 Id.
17 Treas. Reg. I 1.937-1(cX1).
18 See Treas. Reg. I I.937-4)(Ex.1).
19 State of New York. Department of Taxation and Finance. Income franchise Field Audit Bureau.
Nonresident Audit Guidelines. p.26 (2009) fthe "NYS Audit Guidelines").
20 Treas. Reg. I l.937-1(c)(3)(i)(A).
21 Treas. Reg. 9 l.937-1(c)(3)(i)(B). Detailed documentation requirements apply in order for an individual
to be able to take advantage of this nile. See Treas. Reg.. l.937-1(c)(4)(iii).
22 Treas. Reg.. l.937-1(c)(3)(ii)(A).
23 Treas. Reg.4 l.937-1(c)(3)(i)(C).
24 Treas. Reg. I l.937-1(c)(3)(iii)(A). Under a similar rule. if an individual is present in Puerto Rico and
another jurisdiction on the same day, the individual is considered to be present in the jurisdiction in
which his or her tax home is located. Treas. Reg. § l.937-1(c)(3)(iii)(B).
25 Treas. Reg.4 l.937-1(c)(5Xi).
26 Treas. Reg.. 301.7701(b)-2(d)(2).
27 Treas. Reg.. l.937-1(c)(5)(ii)(B).
28 Treas. Reg. 4 l.937-1(d)(1). See also Treas. Reg. 301.7701-2(c)(1).
29 Id.
30 Treas. Reg.. 301.7701(b)-2(c)(2).
31 See Treas. Reg. 31.937-1(e)(1). incorporating the rules contained in Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-(b)-2(d).
32 Treas. Reg. 4 301.7701(b)-2(d)(1). This list contains 10 factors. but the tenth factor is not relevant vis-d-
vls the relationship between the United States and Puerto Rico.
33 Treas. Reg. 4 301.7701(b)-2(d)(2). It is worth noting that occasional use of United States business
facilities should not cause an individual to have a closer connection to the United States. NYS Audit
Guidelines. p. 36.
34 Special attention should be paid to specific items of value, such as jewelry. a rarc book. art or an
antique collection. NYS Audit Guidelines. p.29. In addition, insurance policies should be amended to
state that these items have been moved to Puerto Rico. Id. See Master ofJames & Helen Dlurich. DTA
No. 811479.
35 Treas. Reg. I l.937-1(gXEx.7).
36 The fact that the children remain in the United States in boarding school should not be indicative of a
closer connection to the United States. NYS Audit Guidelines. p. 32.
37 NYS Audit Guidelines. p. 9.
38 Manes ofRudolph & Lorena Zapka. DTA No. 804111.
39 Mauer ofJack Silverman and Frances SlhPennart. DTA No. 802313: Mauer ofMinsky v. Tully. 433
M. 2d 276.
40 In Audit Guidelines. p. 35.
41 Mauer ofHerbert L kardgemer. 599= 2d 312: Mauer ofRichard& Jean Gray. 235 AD 2d 641.
42 Treas. Reg. 1.937-1(1XI).
43 See Treas. Reg. I 1.937-2.
MAYER BROWN 113
EFTA01189751
44 Code § 937(b)(l):. see Treas. Reg. § I.861-2(a)(I) (interest paid by a US resident to a non-US person
is treated as US-source income): Treas. Reg. *1861-3(a)(2) (dividends paid by a US corporation is
US-source income).
45 Treas. Reg. 4 I.937-2(c)(I)(i).
46 Treas. Reg. § I.937-2(cXl)(ii).
47 Treas. Reg. 4 I.937-2(cX2).
48 Treas. Reg. § I.937-2(f)(1Xii).
49 Treas. Reg. 4 I.937-2(f)(l)(vi)(8).
50 Tress. Reg.4 I.937-2(00)(vi)(A).
SI See Code §88I(bX2).
52 Code 4 88l(b)(2XAXii).
53 Code 4 957(c)(I).
54 Treas. Reg. 4 I.937-2(gXI).
55 Tress. Reg.4 I.937-2(gXIXiiXA).
14 I Everyone There Will Have Moved Here!: An Overview of the US Federal and Puerto Rican Tax Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189752
About Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization advising clients
across the Americas, Asia and Europe. Our presence in the world's
leading markets enables us to offer clients access to local market
knowledge combined with global reach.
We are noted for our commitment to client service and our ability
to assist clients with their most complex and demanding legal and
business challenges worldwide. We serve many of the world's largest
companies, including a significant proportion of the Fortune too,
FTSE loo, DAX and Hang Seng Index companies and more than half
of the world's largest banks. We provide legal services in areas such as
banking and finance; corporate and securities; litigation and dispute
resolution; antitrust and competition; US Supreme Court and appellate
matters; employment and benefits; environmental; financial services
regulatory & enforcement; government and global trade; intellectual
property; real estate; tax; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency;
and wealth management.
Please visit for comprehensive contact
information for all Mayer Brown offices.
Mayer Brownisaglobal legal senncesprovider comer dinglegal practices that are separate
mines (thrwayer Brown Practicer). The Mayer Brown Practices are Mayer Brown kkeand
Mayer BrownEurope - Brussels1.1.P. bah Imited liabegpar tnershipsestablished inIllinois USA;
Mayer BrownimernatanalLIP, a Imited habilgpartnershipincorporatcd in England andWales
(authorized and regulated eithesobseterseeplatieo Authorrtyand registered in England and
VOles number OC 303350:Mayer Bronn.a SikAS euabIshedin rance.Mayer Broom JSKa
Hong Kong partnersNp and its associated mine[ in Asia; and Tied &Chequer Athvgados. a
Brazilanlaw paisnershipnIth which Mayer Brown isassecated.imarrareAn- and the Mayer
8ronnlogoarethetrademarksof thetlayer VennPfaCtiCeS SO theiCCOSpettivepitiSCICO011f-
This publeatico prenides in(cemat on and cormencsonlegal issues and developments
ofinterest to our clients and fnends.TheforegeOgis non comprehensive treatment
ofthe sut9ectmat tercowled andisnom:ended so rande legal advice.Readers sheold
seek kellathltebefOrenkhlipoly3CtiOnwithfeipeCt to thematters cis:usu.:I herein_
C 2013.11l0AirfBrOonlPf3COCOSAIVICSTClertti
EFTA01189753
Americas I Asia I Europe MAYER• BROWN
0415
EFTA01189754
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 1487fd66-ef9e-43d6-955f-eacf34b8b0f4
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA01189737.pdf
- Content Hash
- 07cae7a9d2d264f6d19976efb3e4e592
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026