EFTA01200051.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 476.4 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 5 pages
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
L.M., individually,
Defendant(s).
AMENDED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING
COMPLETION OF ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY
(AMENDMENTS TO PARAGRAPHS 3 AND 41
Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. moves this Honorable Court for entry of an
order staying further proceedings with respect to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S Motion for Attorney's
Fees and Costs, and in support thereof would show:
I. EPSTEIN seeks to recover fees and costs against BRADLEY EDWARDS
pursuant to a Proposal for Settlement that offered a payment of $300,000 to BRADLEY
EDWARDS in exchange for a dismissal and release of EDWARDS' claims for compensatory
and punitive damages against EPSTEIN and EDWARDS' acceptance of a prohibition on
EDWARDS, his attorneys, and agents "that they shall not in any method or manner discuss,
publish, or disseminate any information concerning the settlement..." The confidentiality clause
sought to be imposed by EPSTEIN on EDWARDS, his attorneys and agents also broadly sought
to prohibit disclosure of "the reasons for the payment."
EFTA01200051
EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG
Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Additional Discovery
2. As EPSTEIN has correctly observed, "EDWARDS proffered two arguments to
support his assertion that EPSTEIN'S Proposal was invalid: to wit: "[tjhe Proposal is invalid
because EPSTEIN failed to explain material terms of the confidentiality clause, and its
implications; and EPSTEIN cannot prove he has beaten or even equaled his Proposal."
EDWARDS' Opposition pp. 5-6 as quoted in EPSTEIN'S Memorandum of Law Regarding
Ethical Issues...at pg. 2.
3. At the hearing on this matter on December 6, 2014, EDWARDS' counsel focused
attention on one of the troubling "implications" of EPSTEIN'S confidentiality prohibition—the
restriction imposed on EDWARDS' ability to communicate all of the details of his settlement
with EPSTEIN to multiple clients on whose behalf he was actively litigating a Federal Crime
Victims Rights Act proceeding directly challenging the validity of EPSTEIN'S deal with federal
prosecutors which, if successful, has the potential of subjecting both EPSTEIN and his associates
to multiple federal felony charges. The Court ordered supplemental briefing on this issue which
remains uncompleted.
4. The other primary argument presented on EDWARDS' behalf related to the
unestablished value of confidentiality to EPSTEIN. It is with regard to this second argument that
recent public disclosures have demonstrated the need for further discovery and require a stay of
the resolution of the pending motion to allow for completion of that discovery.
5. On Friday, December 19, 2014, a report appeared in the public media alerting
EDWARDS and his counsel for the first time of a substantial financial commitment made by
EPSTEIN in an apparent effort to lessen the severe injuries to his public image suffered as a
2
EFTA01200052
EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXX XM BAG
Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Additional Discovery
consequence of the focus of international attention on his criminal conduct. (See Exhibit #1
attached).
6. How much time, effort and money EPSTEIN spent and committed to spend on
public relations efforts is clearly relevant and material to the value he placed on BRADLEY
EDWARDS' silence. If EDWARDS is able to demonstrate that EPSTEIN expended hundreds of
thousands of dollars in money and services to combat adverse publicity, that information is
probative of the value he himself placed on avoiding that publicity entirely by gagging
BRADLEY EDWARDS.
7. Accordingly, BRADLEY EDWARDS seeks the opportunity to depose JEFFREY
EPSTEIN regarding his public image-related expenditures and to obtain documentary evidence
relevant to such expenditures.
8. Considering the pendency of the appeal on the underlying summary judgment
issued in favor of EPSTEIN (Appellate Brief attached as Exhibit #2), EPSTEIN will suffer no
harm by virtue of the requested stay.
WHEREFORE, BRADLEY EDWARDS requests a stay of further briefing and hearings
with regard to EPSTEIN'S Motion for Fees and Costs to permit the discovery described herein.
Assuming EPSTEIN'S cooperation in the process of setting his deposition and responding to
discovery requests, a stay of 60 days is expected to be adequate.
3
EFTA01200053
EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Additional Discovery
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve
to all Counsel on the attached list, this 3 1 day o L 110A 2015.
Jac Scaro
Florida B' No.: 169440
Atto -Mail(s): jsx®searcylaw.com and
earcylaw.com
PH' ary E-Mail: _scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for EDWARDS
4
EFTA01200054
EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Additional Discovery
COUNSEL LIST
Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Andrew A. Harris, Esquire
marc@nuriklaw.com aah®FLAppellateLaw.com;
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 jew®FLAppellateLaw.com;
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Burlington & Rockenbach
Phone: (954)-745-5849 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 430
Fax: (954)-745-3556 West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Phone: (561)-721-0400
Fax: (561)-721-0465
William Chester Brewer, Esquire Attorneys for Bradley Edwards
wcblaw@aol.com; wcbcg®aol.com
250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire
Phone: (561)-655-4777 staff.efile@pathtojustice.com
Fax: (561)-835-8691 Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Phone: (954)-524-2820
jgoldberger@agwpa.com; Fax: (954)-524-2822
smahoney®agwpa.com
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Fred Haddad, Esquire
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com;
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com
Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fred Haddad, P.A.
Fax: (561)-835-8691 One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394
Phone: (954)-467-6767
John R. Beranek, Esquire Fax: (954)467-3599
jberanek@ausley.com; Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
csullivan®ausley.com
Ausley & McMullen Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire
123 South Calhoun Street tonja@tonjahaddad.com;
Tallahassee, FL 32301 efiling@tonjahaddad.com
Phone: (850)-224-9115 Tonja Haddad, P.A.
Fax: (850)-222-7560 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954)467-1223
Fax: (954)-337-3716
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
5
EFTA01200055
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 13ecd41e-d647-433f-bfad-cbdec47f3b57
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA01200051.pdf
- Content Hash
- 534e968aa02e5037f8bedc1b114c81ca
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026