EFTA02606355.pdf
dataset_11 pdf 340.7 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 5 pages
From: 1 <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:47 PM
To: Valeria Chomsky
Subject: Re: Vincent's reply
i tried a few time he was always " on the=phone"
on Th., Jan 10, 2019 at 11:21 AM Valeria Chomsky
> wrote:
I would li=e to write the following:
Vincent,
=div>There is no "seller's remorse the day after", and = think you and Jason achieved a very good result.
My point is about the information we have available, it is not to qu=stion the amount of the settlement, but to have the
truth established abou= the assets of the trust on December 31, 2014, since they provided a false=information. There is
no reason to accept the false information when we ha=e the documents proving it.
And I don=tB93 see why the acknowledgements wouldn't be possible.
Valeria
<=div>
What do you think?
Valeria
Forwarded message
From: Vincent Pisegna
Date: Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: URGENT
To: Val=ria Chomsky >, Jason B. Curtin
Cc:
Good morning.=C2
Yesterday, we d=scussed at length the choice you faced. You could settle early on ac=eptable terms but to do so, it
required foregoing further investigation in=o the facts of the case. Or, alternatively, you could choose not to settle and
embark on discovery and a further investiga=ion of the facts. You very clearly chose that further litigation was=not in
Noam and your best interests because of the stress that would be in=olved in further litigation and that closure was of
EFTA_R1_01797409
EFTA02606355
paramount importance. Also, the settlement is a very =ood deal for you. This is not an unusual judgment for a client to
ma=e and it is also not unusual to have "seller's remorse =80 the day after a settlement. I do not think we can rescind
the agreement and it doesn't sound like you want to rescind the agreem=nt. We successfully negotiated for a release of
you so let's=see what we can put into the release. I do not think we will be able=to negotiate the acknowledgements
you reference.
Feel free to ca=l if you want to talk about this.
Vincent J. Pisegna
Krokidas & Bluestein LLP
600 Atlantic Avenue
Boston, MA 02210
Tel:
Fax
From: Valeria Chomsky
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:06 AM
To: Vincent Pisegna ason B. Curtin
Cc: Noam Chomsky
Subject: URGENT
Vincent and Jason,
First of all, thank you very much for solving this c=nstant and stressful situation in our life.
2
EFTA_R1_01797410
EFTA02606356
I would like to make some comments that I think are =f paramount importance.
We keep finding outrageous false information from Ma= and Harry, such as that the funds in the Marital Trust was only
until the Lexington house was sold and incorporated to it. This is = flat lie -- as the documents I sent you
prove it (Bainco statement from December 2014 and Harry's e-mail from =ay 2015, when the Lexington house was sold).
Also outrageous to say that the Trust was providing = house to Noam, when the apartment in Cambridge was bought
with half of a =ortgage with a commercial institution that we were paying monthly and with=half of the funds coming
from a loan from the Marital Trust with the highest possible interest rate, when Noam =ould have bought it himself with
the funds from his IRA, that was being di=tributed to them. The only reason for this loan from the Marital Tru=t was to
have the apartment tied to the trust and not allow to have it as a jointly owned property with me, as=Noam requested
many times. Requests very well documented in e-mails =xchanges.
There are numberless other examples of them acting i= bad faith and since it has been a pattern from them, with their
father be=ng competent and productive, I have to express my concerns for the future,=if Noam and/or I become
somehow limited in our cognitive capacities and they try to manipulate again or if Noam di=s before me and they
contest Noam's will.
Although we preferred a settlement, if we would have=gone to court, much more would be discovered and we would
have the documen=s that now we are missing to prove what had been done wrong. With th= settlement we won't have
access to them anymore.
It seems to me that the moment requires that in thei= releases they acknowledge explicitly that they recognized all the
gifts t=ey have received from Noam in the form of trusts for them, trusts for the =randchildren, the Lexington house, the
Wellfleet house, royalties for children and grandchildren, payment of =xpenses, distributions from Noam's IRA to them,
justifying the settlem=nt, and now the Marital Trust where Noam is waiving most of his rights to =t, and most important
also correct through the documents that I provided (Bainco statement and the email from=Harry) that the Marital Trust
in December 31, 2014 had a market value ofl , and that the Lexington house was sold in May 2015, therefore
it =as not the proceeds from the house that elevated the assets of the Marital Trust from to the curre=t
value -- as they falsely stated.
It also should include that they recognize that the =oney that Noam was left with, it is for him to live his life with his
wife= and that if some is left (hopefully Noam will live long enough to use it =11) they agree that Noam decided to leave
in his will only to his wife, Valeria. Therefore with this settle=ent, they are not going to contest Noam's will or claim any
additional=funds.
I think we have to address this information, or we w=ll be signing that all the false information they gave us is correct
and r=sk to have more problems in the future.
3
EFTA_R1_01797411
EFTA02606357
We accept the agreement, but we don't have to ac=ept their false information.
I should add that the only reason I don't want t= go to Court is because I don't want to cause more stress to Noam.
Oth=rwise, I would much prefer to go to Court and have all the issues clarifie=, as I see the non-clarification of them as
potential future problems and accusations.
Valeria Chomsky
Forwarded messa:e
From: Valeria Chomsky
Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:34 PM
Subject: Fake news
To: Vincent Pisegna Jason B. Curtin
Cc: Noam Chomsky
One of the main characteristics of so-called "p=stmodern" societies is to disregard the difference between objective =nd
subjective, truth and lie, reality and fiction.
This case is a striking example of the contempt of o=jective reality by a large number of people who have preferred to
believe =he lie that coincides with their previous opinions. The famous "fake =ews" prevailed over reality, the belief
about reason.
The attachment shows the Carol Chomsky Exempt Marita= Trust, on December 31, 2014 with a market value of
.<=u>
And the email copied below shows that the Lexington =ouse was sold in May 2015.
Something is not right in their allegations.<=>
Valeria Chomsky
4
EFTA_R1_01797412
EFTA02606358
=please note
The information contained in this communication is =onfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside i=formation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the=property of JEE Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this c=mmunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlaw=ul. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to
jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacati=n@gmail.com> , and destroy t=is communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. cop=right -all rights reserved
conversation-id date-last-viewed 0 date-received flags
remote-id
5
EFTA_R1_01797413
EFTA02606359
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 125d0731-a293-4cec-bec8-8b4cd771724a
- Storage Key
- dataset_11/EFTA02606355.pdf
- Content Hash
- 24e5801e451d0cfea886f0f37dfac168
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026