EFTA00145606.pdf

Epstein and Maxwell Rape and Sex Traffick Survivor - Former Client of David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Stanley Pottinger and Brad Edwards. 06 September 2022 When I was seeking legal representation to advocate for my rights as a sex trafficked victim of Epstein, Maxwell and their co-conspirators, David Boies and his firm informed me that they would re me only if I provided a deposition in support of one of his other clients, for use in her civil case. I did not want to provide the deposition as I knew I would have to disclose very personal details that I did not feel ready to tell at that stage. However, I wanted to secure legal representation, so I agreed. Boies and his firm promised me that the deposition would remain sealed entirely and confidential. The deposition transcript, which I can produce, is clearly labelled "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL". I was asked to do the deposition on 17 February 2017. Still, according to my records, I did not sign a retainer with Boies Schiller until 24 February 2017, which shows that they were waiting for me to do the deposition before representing me. They filed my civil claim on 26th January 2017 — before they were even formally my lawyers. On January 10, 2017, I wrote an email to Stan. "Stan Can you please give me a call please thank you S" On January 13, 2017, Stan wrote back to me. "Hi When can we talk? Important that we do so Friday. Send Proton, please. Stan" On January 14th, 2017, I wrote to Stan and Brad. "Stan, Can you please give me an update on what this deposition relates to, i.e. Which case? Also, did you manage to talk with the 1 party you contacted and the other you were trying to contact? Thank you" On January 14th2017 Stan wrote, "The other side has been notified that we will be taking your deposition in the next three weeks. Only the time needs to be worked out. I mention this, as I did in our telcon call today, so that you can be on your toes in case they try to call you, email you, or contact you in any way. Do not talk to them in any fashion. Hang Up. Do not reply to emails. Do not be frightened by anything. Once you are in the open, so to speak, you are safer than ever. They cannot harass you because your name is now part of the United court system. They are not allowed to tamper with you, and if they try, they are subject to legal sanctions by the court. Let me know if you get any strange calls or efforts to contact you. You will be fine, but we want to know of any funny business by the other side. Best, Stan". On 14th January 2017, Stan wrote, 1 EFTA00145606  "Hi, The deposition will be taken in connection with case against Maxwell, which will go to trial in March. The suble,s covered are those we talked about with you in person, including Epstein and . I will talk to you on the phone regarding the scope of the deposition and the related questions you raise, including your own lawsuit against Epstein" On the 21st of February 2017, four days after the deposition, I wrote to Stan, "Stan, when are you able to call me please." On 21Nt February 2017, Stan replies, "What about" On 2ist February 2017, I replied, "Stan, I think you know what it's about. Now that you guys have what you want from me, you have left me high and dry. You obviously don't need me anymore. Your last conversation was a disgrace, and you have let me down and gone back on your word. Our time is finished." Three days later, on the 24th of February 2017, after they had already filed my own lawsuit 26th January 2017, I eventually signed the retainer for Boise Shiller. When I was asked to do the deposition for was frightened, and indeed Jeffrey was trying to find me whilst in hiding. On 2017, Jeffrey contacted another sex trafficked victim . Epstein wrote, "hi, was a friend of yours?" Doing that deposition jeopardised my safety, and it wasn't even for my own case but for another of his clients. I had already been tracked down in Barcelona, and they knew this, which is why I went into hiding in the first place. I made it very dear at the start of the deposition that I was afraid for my and my family's safety and that I had been followed. During the deposition, I was then harassed and intimidated to repeatedly give the address where I was in hiding, including my loved one contact details. This made me very uncomfortable and even more frightened as Ghislaine appeared by telephone for the deposition duration. I don't know who else was listening and remember hearing a male cough at one point during the deposition. I found this incredibly intimidating. I would like to point out that in Brad Edwards's book, "Relentless Pursuit" pg 302 and 303, he said that after my two-day briefing in Barcelona on his way back to Miami had two near-death experiences "In one day, I discovered twice that I was lucky to be alive." 2 EFTA00145607 So, if Brad has experienced two near-death experiences, why on earth would the put me on a plane whilst in hiding with Jeffrey trying to locate me to do deposition a month later!! This shows that Boies and Co had absolutely no regard for me and my then Peter's safety, who flew with me and was always about their other client . This, of course, was not mentioned to me and had the delight of reading about it in his book years after the incidents occurred. If I had known about Brad's er,ces, I would never ever have flown to New York to do that deposition for , but sadly if I had known, I would have had little choice otherwise; they wouldn't have proceeded with my own litigation against Epstein and Co. They could have arranged to do the deposition in Spain to protect me. Perhaps I'm the one that's lucky to be alive?! What is even worse, whilst I was in New York for deposition, they helped me reach out to another fellow survivor who was on the island with me. She was the young ballerina I tried to protect from Epstein and Maxwell and the co-conspirators. We were both raped repeatedly by Epstein whilst on the island together. I wanted to reach out to her to see if she was still alive and tell her I loved her and that I was sorry I didn't take her with me when I fled for my life in 2007 from Epstein and Maxwell. I couldn't. For years I blamed myself for not saving her. On 28th February 2017, (the other rape victim) wrote to me, "Hi IM, it's It was so nice hearing from you, and I can't wait to see you and catch up!" On 28th February 2017, I wrote to Stan and Brad, "I'm just going to forward any correspondence I have with her." On the ist of March 2017, Stan wrote to me saying that he had managed to contact her, "I sent an email to her inviting her to a risk-free chat. This would be an ideal time for you to send her an email encouraging her to meet and assuring her that she can trust me. She has absolutely nothing to lose and potentially a lot to gain. Tnx." It breaks my heart that whilst I was trying to connect with a long-lost friend and fellow survivor of Epstein, I led her straight into the lion's den. I won't forgive myself for that. was also a key witness in my own litigation because she would corroborate my story and whom we met on the island, for example, Epstein and Maxwell's long-time friends Sergey Brim (Co-Founder of Google) and his then fiancé Ann Wojcicki (Co-Founder of 23&ME) on it January 2007. 3 EFTA00145608  fully corroborated my story! We also both had a disk of photos that Jean Luc Brunel gave us during one trip to the island which included ictures of us, another rape victim, Epstein, Maxwell, and Jean Luc himself, staff etc. I also have an email from on 28 December 2006 confirming this trip. correspondence of that specific trip below will also be included in my evidence. "Here is your flight details..You will be going with a girl named and a guy named Valdson. They will both be staying at3oi E. 66 as well. I have a car picking you all up at 6:45am if you want to meet in tlii i.Please let me know you got this.. thanks!Traveler(s) Frequent flier detai Saturday, December 30, 2006Continental Airlines 1884Depart: 9:25ammorning Newark, NJNewark Liberty Int'l (EWR)Arrive: 2:43pmafternoon St Thomas Island, Virgin Islands (U.S.)St Thomas Island Cyril E King (SIT)Econom Boein 737-700 Passenger (73G) I 4hr 18min I 1635 milesSeat: This confirms that I was housed in one of Epstein's residences, where most rape survivors were housed. Initially, said she would help me, but she just disappeared "conveniently", and I never heard from her again. I was shocked to see her in the courtroom when on 29th August 2019, Judge Richard M Burman kindly invited the survivors who had the bravery and courage to come forward to have a voice. Epstein's death was a tragedy because he would never be held accountable for his crimes against humanity. All of us were profoundly and still are affected by this miscarriage of justice, thanks to the DOJ. Judge Burman gave us a slice of dignity and self-worth back when we all gave our Victim Impact Statements, and he finally gave some of us our day in court after years of fighting for justice. Burman didn't want us to be "Silenced" in our fight for justice. For that, I'm most grateful. I never got to thank him personally. The other Umatilla: day is that it turned out that Brad and Stan were now representing I wish Brad and Stan had told me they had contact with her and found this confusing and distressing, especially as they knew I had reached out to her before for my own litigation. I'm also confused about why she wasn't subpoenaed and deposed in my own litigation or her little sister. My case was unduly "settled" in December 2018, yet the very key witness that would provide testimony is now their client a mere 8 months later. I'm assuming they also represented her little sister too, which also could have provided information on Epstein's sex trafficking conspiracy. I also don't understand why Igor Zinoviev, Epstein's bodyguard, was not subpoenaed in my own litigation. In Brad's book, pg.; 305, he said he met Igor after meeting me in Barcelona. Igor, who was also a key witness in my litigation, confirmed to Brad that I did try and swim off the island that night after I had been repeatedly raped by Epstein. 4 EFTA00145609 "Yes, he confirmed that tried to swim off the island, but her attempt showed no greater level of distress than he'd seen in other girls throughout the years. The rest of the meeting had little to do with the girls and much to do with the danger he saw me putting myself in with Epstein". This was a direct threat to Brad and his safety. Again, I ask, why would they then put me on a plane less than a month later to benefit another client, n In my previous grievance dated 19th August 2022, I wrote, "In 2020, Boise and his firm asked the courts to unseal my deposition against my wishes and make the evidence public. This is because to do so would benefit another of his clients, , but was strongly counter to my interests." Upon my own investigation and that of Law 360, which was reported on 26th August 2022 (David Boies Faces Grievance Complaint Over Epstein Case I would like to point out that Boies Shiner had been disqualified from representing in the Dershowitz case since her (and my) attorneys could be called to testify as part of the underlying allegations in the case, according to a court order. "Other attorneys for were on board with at least disclosing records that directly concerned Dershowitz. However, before making its decision on the bid to unseal records, the court asked Jane Does, which included , to register any objection." When the judge did give the Jane Does an opportunity to rirgragjections, I had to hear the news from another sex trafficked survivor another of David Boies's Clients. I made my feelings very clear about the release of my deposition when I wrote to Brad on 23" April 2020, "Dear Brad, Thank you for taking time out for me yesterday. Unfortunately I had some bad news from Sigrid yesterday and am besieged and riddled with FEAR, anger and hatred! Enough'', m I have had enough mm I'm inconsolable since Sigrid and my conversation yesterday. Alan is after me. He will find me and serve me.For what??? This is not my case, I chose my battles wisely and this was not a fight I have the strength to fight. If I wanted to be involved in this shit show I would have sued Alan myself but chose a life of peace and solidarity instead. And my voice was silenced by the very people I trusted. For what! Do I need to jump off another balcony to appease all of you, because I will!!You will never know what I went through. Ever! What do you want from me! I'm broken now I have to live in fear, once a Everyday, every month, every year until Alan finds me! I supported once before, and will not do it again. She also betrayed me. I'm aware of the amount she earned through her settlement. Not even a fraction of what was com ensated to me. I know this as a fact. I spent two years living in isolation in a here I didn't have an English conversation for two years because I 5 EFTA00145610 was so frightened. For what! I was followed i none of you believed me but you were almost taken out twice at the airport after meeting me) and my life threatened yet you guys still did not believe me. I will give you my previous address so you can research where I lived and maybe then you'll have some respect for me and what I have actually been through. Now I must live in fear once more!!!! Alan will find mem', For what, so VR can get another payout!!! I will rather jump again!!! And I'm not joking! Who will protect me??? David Boies, that's as bad as a knock knock joke! I will not be betrayed again! I'm tired of being used! I later followed up with an email to Brad, 23rd April 2020 7.39pm UK Time, "If Alan or his cronies come anywhere near me or my home, you will all have blood on your hands." On 5th August 2020, I wrote to Sigrid, S sent me this. What on earth is going on?". On 5th August 2020, I wrote again to Sigrid, "I have two days, Sigrid!". On 6th AiS 2020, Sigrid responds, "That is texting a clip from an Order from the v. Dershowitz case that Judge Preska issued — (I am not counsel in that case, but she is the same Judge that is overseeing the unsealing process in the v. Maxwell case). There is a Protective Order in that case, and Dershowitz is seeking certain documents under the Protective Order. She is giving anyone who wants to object until August 8th to lodge an objection which is why I reached out to you yesterday about setting up a call with the lawyer I found who can represent you pro bono to help you with that objection. I have not heard back from him regarding a time for that call yet. Here is the full order above from the v. Dershowitz case." On 6th August 2020, Sigrid follows up with another email which says, "I was typing too fast — so sorry — It is August 18th, so you have 13 days to lodge an objection — she just issued the order. I am helping you by finding you a lawyer that can represent you so you can submit the objection you want to make. I just have not heard back from him yet on a time for a call. I will let you know as soon as I hear. " liI should never have been informed by another sex trafficked survivor .r Fir who first went to the FBI in which included her sister to report this sex trafficking conspiracy another client of Boise who after years of representing me, they were just about to betray me. I'm grateful to At thati r,t, I had days per my email to Sigrid. If I hadn't received a warning from and emailed Sigrid, when would my attorneys have told me? Before it's too late? I assume yes!! Clever strategy but failed. Secondly, they again created a conflict of interest between two existing clients for benefit. They received my doctor's letter in July. They were fully aware that I did not want to be involved in any more litigation, especially be a witness for again in any other of her civil suits so that she and her attorneys could have another payday. 6 EFTA00145611 Thirdly, they should not have continued to represent me with our compensation fund application against Epstein's Estate. They were no longer my lawyers and had a conflict of interest because of MB How do I know that they, in fact, represented my best interests as their former client? I did get compensation however feel that no victim was compensated correctly and feel it was more silencing money to sign away any further legal proceedings against the perpetrators, and every single victim that came forward signed away their rights for scrapes. Fourthly, it's appalling that Sigrid gave me, her client, so little time to find a new law firm to represent me and to put my case together to protect myself and my family. At this point, I was desperate to find new lawyers to represent me in the fight against Boise's attempt to go public with a deposition that I never wanted to give and was promised would be forever kept under seal. This fight is ongoing and has harmed me immeasurably. They knew that deposition had sensitive material about my private life and family, including their contact details which I did not feel comfortable giving to Ghislaine's attorneys (AS I WAS IN HIDING). I was incredibly embarrassed about my past, which was later used against me in litigation to my detriment. Due to Boies and Co giving me so little time to prepare to objec.taiiinst my deposition being released to the public, which would benefit massively in her upcoming civil trial against Dershowitz, I wrote to Brad on August' th, 2020, "Dear Brad, I authorize you to speak to Steve Kelly and his team regarding matters concerning my intention to file an objection to the unsealing of my deposition in the Southern District of New York. I'm really concerned though as Sigrid said she had found a lawyer to represent me Pro Bono to make the objection but she said he hadn't got back to her. That was two days ago. I can't afford a lawyer to help me and feel very let down and abandoned by other parties, you are very much excluded from this. Would Steve be able to do the objection pro bono? I'm at a loss of what to do and completely traumatised by the whole thing. I have until the i8 th August to put in my objection and time is running out." On 7th August 2020 Brad responds, 7 EFTA00145612 Because of the particular legal conflict, I cannot speak with Steve on your behalf on this matter. It's just not allowed or I would do it of course. He is a reasonable and good guy, which is why I connected you to him. He will do a good job. However, I doubt he will handle this pro bono but you can ask him. If you learn who Sigrid was connecting you with, let me know and I'll see if I know them. Brad" I signed a retainer with Marsh Law Firm plc on 13th August 2020, and superhero Bob filed a motion on the 25th of August 2020 toprotect m rivacy and to STOP ME FROM BEING PULLED INTO ANOTHER CASE AGAINST MY WILL! From what I understand, it was Paul Cassell who helped find James Marsh Law Firm. I would like to make it dear that if the judge had not given the Jane Does an extension to put in their objections, I would have, without question, missed the 18th August 2020 deadline. Boies and Co knew this, too otherwise, they would have helped me seek other legal representation months earlier and not right at the last moment when they knew fine well that the initial deadline was near enough impossible to meet. I can also produce a note fro Sigrid McCawley, dated gist July 20 , w is was a e o my compensa 'on fund claim against Epstein's Estate, in which they represented me. Dr Lockwood wrote, "it is important for her healing for Ms to be able to process her past without the ongoing disruption of court proceedings and with her confidentiality being maintained." My current attorneys, Bob and James, also wrote a letter, which I can also produce, saying that I "should not now be forced to endure further emotional turmoil by being pulled (unwillingly) into another round of heated litigation, with its attendant public feeding frenzy." I was so afraid of the deposition being unsealed that I felt forced to write my memoir, "Silenced No More, Surviving My Journey To Hell And Back," and include most of all of the details that I disclosed in the deposition in an attempt to take control of the narrative. Consequently, I have been massively victim shamed, which has taken an enormous toll on me emotionally. 8 EFTA00145613 I also feel that Boies Schiller failed to help me when I desperately tried to give my evidence to the FBI and the prosecutors involved in the federal investigation against Maxwell and others in Epstein's sex trafficking conspiracy. I had approached the FBI several times, asking to be interviewed and share my evidence about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme. Still, I never got a response and repeatedly tried to make an official complaint against them too but was ignored by the FBI. I requested Sigrid to help me with this, and she responded in an email dated February 4th, 2020, which I can produce: "I do not have experience with complaints to the FBI and that I was trying to get a hold of David who is in the USVI handling the hearing today. When I am able to reach him I will discuss this with him and get back to you." As far as I know, no one at the firm ever pursued my complaint against the FBI." On February 4, 2020, I wrote to Sigrid, saying, "I don't feel that I am being represented equally or fairly and have never been either. I'm tired of being ignored not only by you guys but also by the FBI and Scotland Yard. I have been shown no respect, humility, kindness or compassion by anyone." In my view, this is a direct obstruction of justice at its finest in an ongoing federal investigation not only by Boies and Co but also by the federal prosecutors in the FBI carrying out the investigation. My evidence includ photographic evidence of Epstein, Maxwell, Jean Luc Brunel, M other rape victims, including , who had also come forward at that point the date Se ey Brim (another long-term friend of Epstein's and the Clintons) and ho visited the island and Cathy Alexander, the house manager on the islan s e is in the background in a photo). I also have multi le evidence against and . Flight logs which show was on with us on at least one occasion email correspondence between myself and my recruited and a first-hand witness Igor. He cooperated with Brad, as mentioned before, who confirmed I tried to swim off the island due to being in extreme distress. I would like to clarify that I called the Metropolitan Police, not Scotland Yard, on the 30th of January 2020 to try and report the sex trafficking ring and the perpetrators who enabled my rape and others. I have the recording upon request. As as informed to go to my local olice Station to report my crime of an international sex trafficking operation. The lo 'olice station didn't speak English. Because my lawyers were not helping me give my statement and evidence to the FBI, I was forced to go to a separate organisation, the Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe (OSCE), on my own to try and give my evidence about Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators. Although my case had been settled (to my detriment and to silence me...again), I still wanted to hold these people accountable. 9 EFTA00145614 Money was never my drive to prevent further children and women from being raped. There were no civil suits on the horizon, just a passion for helping other human beings, so they didn't suffer as I and many others had. When Brad sent me a signed copy of his book in his personal message to me, he wrote, "=, I remember your first call like it was yesterday. For you, it was never about the money and only doing the right thing. The world needs more like you. Your Courage will never be forgotten by me". On 25 February 2020, I wrote to the OSCE: "I will fight this battle with everything I have to give, and I'm not giving up hope. So yes, please pass on my information to the right people. Not only for me but for every rape victim that has been abused previously, for every current rape victim and future." A representative at OSCE said she had passed on my evidence to the US Department of Homeland Security, but I never heard back from them. On the 9th Match 2020, the representative wrote to me, "Dear_, I hope this finds you well, and Peter is getting better. I want to inform you that we passed your evidence to a US Homeland Security chargé. Best wishes, Lilia" I expressed my concern in an email to another attorney, Brad Edwards. I wrote on March 23, 2020: "I no longer want to be represented by Boies Schiller. I understand this is complex, but I don't feel they have worked in my interest or the other victims." On April 6, 2020, I expressed my sense of betrayal to Stan Pottinger directly in an email. He did not respond. On the 28th of July 2020 I was utterly shocked and retraumatized when the Daily Mail found the woman i living in LA. She is the one responsible for coercing and profiting handsomely from befriending me in a nightclub and luring me into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, which resulted in me being repeatedly raped. It was a shock to see her, but Boies and Co told me they could not locate her during my own litigation, which is why she was never subpoenaed and deposed. The article is titled "Elusive Epstein sex ring 'recruiter' who 'lured young women to financier's Paedophile Island' is spotted starting her 'new life in Los Angeles as friends insist 'she was a victim too.'" On Jul 29, 2020, at 7:02 AM I wrote to Brad Edwards regarding the article. "Omg! What a liar, she knew exactly what would happen to me after meeting JE. 10 EFTA00145615 Epstein's sex ring 'recruiter' is spotted hiding away in Los Angeles" On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 1 at 13:15, Brad Edwards < > wrote, "Let's talk tomorrow. As with all things in this case, nothing is simple. The fact that is cooperating could actually be really good for your claim so let's think this through before reacting. I thought I told you to stop reading this smut! Kidding. I knew you couldn't stop altogether. But it really rarely helps. Either way, hang tight. We will talk tomorrow. I'll send you an email when I get in with the call in number." , who was on the island with me on more than one occasion, was there to ifiline and others between rapes, as were others when wasn't around. is a long-time employee of Jeffrey Epstein, profiting greatly from this sex trafficking conspiracy. went on to marry heportedly from Belarus, in October 2013, according to Daniel Bates for the Daily Mail. 3rd of March 2020 - Daily Mail "This is the dentist girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein who he phoned from prison just before he hanged himself — but gave no hint he was so despondent he was about to commit suicide" They reportedly got divorced in July 2019 after Jeffrey Epstein was arrested. Karyna Shuliak, is reportedly the last person to speak to Epstein before his death when he rang her on 10th August 2019. I would like to point out that Boies joined Theodore Olsen (the attorney who represented Bush against Al Gore in 2001, Boies being the attorney) in the fight for same-sex marriage (which I fully support) in the state of California. The case Perry V Brown began in 2009. It was argued in the Supreme Court on 26th March 2013 and decided on 26th June 2013. 11 EFTA00145616  andaere subsequently married in October 2013. Was this in the State of California? I presume we will find out in due course. I hope for Boies's sake they were not married in the state of California because once again, everything he does and touches always leads back to aiding and abetting a sex trafficking scheme which was used to grant visas to Epstein and Co's victims, which has been widely reported as another way to get Epstein victims visas to enter the US. I'm also confused about how Brad Edwards could also be attorney. I mentioned her repeatedly during my litigation and in my deposition for . Why was she not subpoenaed in my own litigation? I would also like to make clear that in my own litigation on 20th December 2018, on the docket, it says my case was dismissed voluntarily without prejudice against M=, and she did not respond to the lawsuit. They said they couldn't find her. Daily Mail found it very easy. Again, a little black cube action on her would have worked in a rape victim's favour, No? But it's ok to behave like that when trying to intimidate and silence witnesses and the New York Times journalists in another former client's case, serial rapist Harvey Weinstein but not for justice for another? Of course, they could have found her and did so only afteasase was unlawfullaled, just like they could have found Igor, etc. Igor and had already corroborated my story right from the beginning in January 2017. I understand that if they had all been subpoenaed and ignored the subpoena, they would have all been found guilty of contempt of court, which is a criminal offence punishable by prison. None of the named persons was deposed in my own litigation. Nor am I aware that any other depositions were taken, for example, Epstein's, Maxwell and and Therefore, I accuse Boies and Co of aiding and abetting Epstein and co's sex trafficking conspiracy where I and hundreds if not thousands of children and young 12 EFTA00145617 women were repeatedly raped. How many others were raped after I came forward in October 2016 to get justice for what these people did?? I'm aware that Epstein was arrested after returning from Paris. I would like to point out that the age of sexual consent is shockingly 15 in France. Epstein should never have been allowed to leave the United States of America after he was first convicted in 2008. David Boies and Stan Pottinger also asked me to put my name to an op-ed in the New York Times titled "How David Boies Saved Me." I received a call from Pottinger asking me to do this on a Saturday morning after not having heard from my lawyers for several weeks and sending distressed emails asking for any updates on my case. Then, I finally received contact from my lawyers in the form of a call from Pottinger asking me to agree to put my name on the Op-Ed. I felt Boies and Pottinger wanted me to do it, so I agreed. I firmly believe this went against my interests and that Boies used me to rehabilitate his reputation. I feel that this is highly inappropriate. I had repeatedly begged the lawyers to do a media campaign to expose Epstein and co and wanted to encourage more victims to come forward. I was repeatedly ignored. On 29 August 2017 I had an update from Brad regarding my own litigation, "Epstein's attorneys have been successful in delaying things further. We will be in touch and let you know how long the case gets delayed. It is somewhat complicated so let me give you the simple version. Epstein's lawyer argued to the court that they want to include some information (particularly the Callahan emails and portions of your deposition) in their Motion to Dismiss; however, those emails and that testimony were collected under a protective order in the Maxwell case, which currently prevents the use of those materials. You Judge told them to request relief from the protective Order from the Judge in the other case and if he grants that relief then they can use those materials. At this point, the other Judge has not ruled on whether those materials can be used, so we are in a holding pattern and there is currently nothing we can do to speed up the process. We will of course let you know as soon as we hear anything. Ask any questions you may have, and we will try to answer but just don't know much more and can't currently do anything more. I hope all is well. Talk to you soon." On October 17, 2017, I wrote to Brad as I hadn't heard any updates in my case for sometime. "Good Morning Brad, I hope you are well? We havent spoken for awhile so I thought I would just check on how everything is going? Kind Regards 13 EFTA00145618 On 17 October 2017 Brad responded, "We are still tied up in hearings related to Epstein trying to obtain and use your Callahan emails for the purpose of having your case dismissed. We are fighting those attempts but Epstein is putting many eggs in that basket so they are fighting to use them. It seems like the Court is going to be willing to let Epstein use them, although that does not necessarily mean the Court will be willing to dismiss your case. Once the Court makes any meaningful rulings on the issue, we will let you know. How have you been?" On 17th October 2017, I responded, "Thanks for the update. I am good actually. I feel like I have come along way emotionally and mentally through this period. Despite what happens, I will never regret coming forward as it made me deal with issues that I had kept hidden which made me a very angry person for a very long time. This Weinsten bussiness has brought a bit of upset back because its along the similar lines as myself however feel Epsein is worse. If the trial doesnt happen, I do feel positive now that the media will definitly be interested in all my photos, emails everything and my story. The nice thing is that there is zero motive for money on my part because ill just hand everything over and not ask for a single cent in return. I want to humiliate him like he did me and the recent media coverage has given me hope. I still stand by those email I sent to Callahan and by no means should that stop this going to trial. I really hope the judge uses his brains but time will tell. It will not look good for him if he dismisses this case. Thanks Brad for everything and your in my prayers everyday." On 17 October 2017, I send a follow-up email to Brad, "Is there no way we can use this Wienstien media coverage to our advantage? Can we not leak about Jeffery and Ghilslain? Has G been found yet? Maybe this will up our game, get more girls ro come forward and put preassure on the judge?" On 17 October 2017, Brad responded, "We found and served G last week. So she is in. Did you ever meet Weinstein? Do you know anything about a relationship between Weinstein and Epstein? If so, how do we prove it? " 14 EFTA00145619 On Oct 17, 2017, I responded to Brad, "Well done for finding that horrid woman. I would have paid good money to see her face when served. Good job :) Can we prehaps have a quixk chat instead. Just 5 mins to explain where i am going with this. At least its something we should consider. Please let me know when is a good time to chat? " On 17 October 2017, Brad sends a follow-up email, "Did you ever meet Weinstein? Just curious. I have a reason for asking." On 17 October 2017, I responded, No i havent ever met him but i suspect they were friends. Too many similarities including their involvment with the Clinton Fountaion. However if I come forward with my story re Epstein any involvement that those two have had together would for sure come out. io0%. I would like to go to the media. I think the time is rigt now. Can we that? On 17 October 2017, Brad responded, "I will be with Stan today. He is flying down from New York. Let me talk with him and then I will circle back with you." On 17th October 2017, I responded to Brad "Thanks Basically the question is : With the momentum of the Weinstein issues creating a catalyst for girls to come forward . Should we/I/someone make a call via the media/social media for girls `abused' by Epstein et al to come forward? Let's discuss an appropriate plan going forward please !! S" On 1.7th October 2017, Brad responded, "I understand. There is a Weinstein/epstein connection though that we are looking into presently." 15 EFTA00145620 On 20th October 2017, I wrote to Brad, "Hi Brad, How is everything going? Please let me know when your ready to chat. Kind Regrads On 2" November 2017, I wrote to Brad again, "Hi Brad, I hope you are well? Please can we arrange a time to talk? Kind Regards On the 7th of November 2017, I wrote to Brad again, "Hi Brad I havent heard back from you for weeks now. Has something happened, are ypu ok? I dont know what else to think really? Please can you get in touch with me. Im loosing my mind waiting to have some for of communication??" On 7th November 2017, after multiple emails to Brad, I finally got a response, "I'm sorry. We have a hearing related to your case tomorrow which I will report back to you on. I'm in NY with Stan right now as a mater of fact. Another hearing in your case next week regarding Maxwell. We are still wrestling with them on the email issue and whether confidentiality will be a part of your case. I'll set up a call with you as soon as I get a chance. I have to fly out to Chicago today for hearings there then my own depo in FL. So this week is extra busy." The Op-Ed was published on the 15th of November 2017 in the New York times. On 22 November 2017, 7 days after the Op-Ed was published, the radio silence began again, and I emailed Brad for an update on my own litigation. 16 EFTA00145621 "Morning Brad, Hope you are well? Just wondering how eveything is going that side? Do we know if this is going to trial yet? Any features ruffled with the letter that was published re David Boies? Kind Regards On 24th November 2017, 9 days after the Op-Ed was published, I write to Brad again for an update on my own case, "Hi Brad Has everything gone well with those hearings? Thanks This op-ed was the first time I publicly outed myself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Before this, my civil case was filed under "Jane Doe 43". My lawyers should not have pressured me to go public for the benefit of another attorney. I also would NOT IN A MILLION YEARS have put my name to the Op-Ed if I knew Boies was photographed having dinner with Harvey Weinstein and his wife, Bill and Hilary Clinton, on 13th December 2016. I was tricked and wholly used by Boies Shiner, Brad and Stan. An article in The American Lawyer dated January 8, 2018, reads: "After first outing herself to defend David Boies in a letter to The New York Times, is giving up the pseudonym "Jane Doe 43" in a sex trafficking lawsuit against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein." I would also like to point out that I again used David Boies and Co after the Op-Ed was published. On 25Th November 2017, again on a Saturday, Stan asked to use my Affidavit in a bar proceeding which had nothing to do with my own litigation. How could I not give permission when there were no updates on my litigating? I was desperate and they knew it. "Hi, 17 EFTA00145622 There is another possible use of your short affidavit, that is, in addition to the filing of it in the federal district court case against Epstein, and in addition to filing of it in the Florida Bar proceeding. It is possible that we will want to show your affidavit to a reporter for the Washington Post who is writing about Dershowitz. I assume that your telephone permission for us as your attorneys to file or use your affidavit as we deem useful remains agreeable, but I'd appreciate your confirming that in a reply to this email. If the affidavit is used and gets attention in the Washington Post, or elsewhere, we will, of course, let you know. Hope all is well and you are enjoying the start of the holiday season. Sending best, Stan" On 25th November 2017, I responded to Stan's request, "Stan All agreed S" On 25th November 2017, Stan sends another email, "Hi, We talked earlier about David Boies' filing one of your two affidavits--the "second," shorter version you signed at the U.S. embassy--that is, the affidavit with the less specific description of your encounter with Dershowitz--and you were fine with that. (Actually, as I recall, you said Boies Schiller had permission to file either affidavit.) I'm sending this email to confirm your permission to file the affidavit. To refresh your recollection, this affidavit has been filed in your case against Epstein, and we suspect that Dershowitz has seen it, courtesy of Epstein. The forum in the present case is different: instead of filing it in a federal court case, it will be filed in a proceeding before the Florida State Bar. That proceeding is confidential, so the affidavit itself should remain confidential. Hope all is well. Drop a line confirming, if you would. Sending best, Stan" On 25th November 2017, I again responded to Stans's request, 18 EFTA00145623 "Hi Stan Yes as previously stated please proceed to file the affidavit S" On 25th November 2017, Stan wrote again, I sent you an email seeking your express written permission to use one or both of your affidavits (signed at the U.S. embassy) in connection with a Florida Bar proceeding. There is a near-identical proceeding before the District of Columbia bar as well. If you grant permission to use your affidavits in the Florida bar proceeding, would you be kind enough to reply to this email granting use of the affidavits in the D.C. bar proceeding as well? Many thanks. Stan" On 25th November 2017, I once again responded, "Stan Yes agreed S" I have no idea what this bar proceeding was about but again couldn't decline even if I wanted to! I would like to point out that the New York Bar Association's Rules of Professional Conduct state that "loyalty and independent judgement are essential aspects of a lawyer's relationship with a client" "The professional judgement of a lawyer should be exercised, within the bounds of the law, solely for the benefit of the client and free from compromising infuences and loyalties". By Boies and Co pressuring me to do the deposition for Op-Ed and get involved in another bar proceeding that had nothing to do with me and my case is a direct violation of this rule. They put their own interests above me, the client, and they violated their duty of loyalty to me. I have also been told by Lisa EIM a documentary producer at Netflix, that representatives of Boies Schiller told her not to interview me for a documentary, despite me wanting to do the interview and tell my story despite me still being a client of theirs. This is a direct violation of the duty of loyalty to their client, me. 19 EFTA00145624 Lisa said that someone from Boies Schiller informed her that I was "a drunk" who was not credible and should not be interviewed. I have heard that this was also said to other journalists whom I cannot name. I would like to clarify this and have the witnesses back me up; I DID NOT TOUCH ONE DROP OF ALCOHOL FOR THREE AND A HALF YEARS UNTIL I MET THAT HORRIBLE BUNCH OF HUMANS!!! FACT!! I did not drink when Brad and Stan came to Barcelona in January 2017, nor did I drink when I was in New York for the I did deposition for . They knew I was a recovering alcoholic. Due to their inrPecant GASLIGHTING, GHOSTING AND USING ME TIME AND TIME AGAIN FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES, I WAS IN HIDING IN FEAR OF MY LIFE FOR TWO YEARS; what did they expect? Strategic, I think so. Again, I would like to remind you that the New York Bar Association's Rules of Professional Conduct state that "loyalty and independent judgement are essential aspects of a lawyer's relationship with a client" "The professional judgement of a lawyer should be exercised, within the bounds of the law, solely for the benefit of the client and free from compromising influences and loyalties". It is a massive betrayal for a lawyer to speak this way about their client and attempt to smear the reputation of someone they should be protecting and fighting for. I also heard directly from Vicky Ward that Vanity Fair journalist herself that David had told her a lot about me when she approached me at Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in December 2021. I was in tears and very upset after that encounter which every journalist, including Bob, my lawyer in the overflow room, could confirm. Linked to this, I feel that Boies Schiller was generally trying to discourage me from publicly telling my story. Stan Pottinger wrote to me on 9 November 2018, when he knew I was recovering from a very serious suicide attempt linked to the re- traumatisation of my civil case: "Just a note here to let you know that we have entered a sensitive period when none of us—and least of all you, our star plaintiff—can speak to the press about anything. If you get an inquiry from anyone, simply tell them to call me or Sigrid, but do NOT give them anything further. They may ask for innocuous things—Like, Are you okay? Are you the person who filed the suit against Epstein? Did you recently go to a hospital?—all things that have simple and straightforward answers but cannot be answered by you. DON'T GIVE THEM ANYTHING, literally." Was this to benefit me and my litigating?? I think not. The New York Intelligencer, on 30th September 20181 published the article, "The Bad, Good Lawyer - 20 EFTA00145625 Was David Boies just doing right by Harvey Weinstein? Or did he cross an ethical line?". I didn't see the article as I had my suicide attempt on 5th October 2018 and remained in hospital for three weeks and didn't have access to any communication, so I wouldn't have seen the article and was in no fit state to talk to anyone, never mind a journalist. Living in Spain was also tricky following US-related articles as there are restrictions to information on US-related matters within the media. Boies and Co knew my feelings about Weinstein and the Clintons due to their involvement with Epstein and Co. They also knew I would have gone entirely berserk big time if I had found out about the article then, never mind now. This was said to prevent me from finding out about the article! Next, I accuse Boies and Co of perverting the course of justice in my own litigation. Not only was I told by my attorneys under no circumstances to go to the FBI because all my evidence would disappear" when I first came forward, but Boies Schiller and Co, DID NOT correctly represen