DOJ-OGR-00014367.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Extraction** **Case Number:** 1:20-cr-00330-PAE **Document Number:** 765 **Filed Date:** 08/10/22 **Page Number:** 63 of 95 **Case Number (Header):** LCIAMAX2ps **Header Text:** * Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document 765 * Filed 08/10/22 * Page 63 of 95 **Transcript Text:** 1. the question of knowledge as to age, what's your response? Why isn't it applicable with respect to what the defense has put in issue with regard to that? 2. isn't it applicable with respect to what the defense has put in issue with regard to that? 3. issue with regard to that? 4. MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. The witnesses themselves -- sorry, your Honor. One moment. 5. THE COURT: Yes. 6. MR. PAGLIUCA: If you don't mind, your Honor, it's easier for me -- 7. THE COURT: Since it's Saturday, I will break my one-lawyer-per-issue rule. 8. MR. PAGLIUCA: I appreciate it. My recollection is the testimony from each of the four witnesses, I will call them, is that they said that they told Ms. Maxwell their age. 9. Carolyn said that she told Ms. Maxwell her age. Jane said she told Ms. Maxwell her age. Similarly, Kate said she told Ms. Maxwell her age. 10. Ms. Maxwell her age. 11. So there is no "I'm not trying to find out what her age is" evidence in this case. The evidence that was elicited -- I think this is, you know, largely through 12. Mr. Alessi. Mr. Alessi said that he only saw two people at the house that he thought were under the age of 18, and that was Ms. Roberts and Jane. I'm trying to remember everybody's names. 13. So that's that testimony. 14. I don't think there's any other testimony in the **Footer Text:** * SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. * (212) 805-0300 * DOJ-OGR-00014367 **Note:** The document appears to be a transcript of a court proceeding, with the text representing the dialogue between the judge, lawyers, and witnesses. The formatting is consistent with a standard transcript, with each speaker's name and testimony numbered and indented accordingly.