EFTA01107603.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 208.4 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 5 pages
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.
PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED
RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned
counsel and pursuant to this Court's order and Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil
Procedure, hereby files his amended' responses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley
Edward's Interrogatories to Jeffrey Epstein as follows:
A. With regard to all communications that occurred at any time prior to the filing of
your civil lawsuit against Bradley Edwards in which communication you expressed the
position that Bradley Edwards was a knowing participant in the efforts of Scott Rothstein to
defraud investors (the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme) or that Bradley Edwards engaged in
any misconduct relating to the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme, state the following:
1. a detailed description of the contents of the communication;
2. all participants in and parties to the communication;
I As per the trial court's order and pending hearing, Epstein is not responding as to any communication that may
have occurred with counsel.
EFTA01107603
3. the date, time, place and circumstances of the communication including
how the communication was made;
4. whether, when, how and why the contents of the communication were ever
subsequently related to any other person;
5. whether and how the contents of the communication were ever memorialized
in any manner and, if so, the identity of everyone having custody of such
memorialization.
ANSWER: No such non-privileged communication occurred. In other words, I never had
any conversation regarding the propriety of filing suit against Rothstein and Edwards with
anyone other than my counsel(s), which would require the disclosure of information that is
protected by the attorney/client privilege. United Services Auto. Ass'n. v. Roth, 859 So. 2d
1270, 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Bd., 958 So. 2d 1003
(Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, I assert the attorney/client privilege as provided for in §
90.502 of the Florida Statutes.
B. With regard to any request, direction, or authorization to sue Bradley Edwards
communicated by you at any time prior to the filing of your civil lawsuit against Bradley
Edwards, state the following:
1. a detailed description of the contents of the communication;
2. all participants in and parties to the communication;
3. the date, time, place and circumstances of the communication including
how the communication was made;
4. whether, when, how and why the contents of the communication were ever
subsequently related to any other person;
5. whether and how the contents of the communication were ever memorialized
in any manner and, if so, the identity of everyone having custody of such
memorialization.
ANSWER: No such non-privileged communication occurred. In other words, I never had a
EFTA01107604
conversation as delineated above with anyone other than my counsel(s), which would
require the disclosure of information that is protected by the attorney/client privilege.
United Services Auto. Ass'n. v. Roth, 859 So. 2d 1270, 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Nevin v.
Palm Beach County School Bd., 958 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, I assert
the attorney/client privilege as provided for in § 90.502 of the Florida Statutes.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon
all parties listed below, via Electronic Service, this November 5, 2013.
/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.
Fla. Bar No.: 0176737
LAW OFFICES OF TONIA HADDAD, PA
315 SE Th Street
Suite 301
Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301
EFTA01107605
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Jeffrey Epstein, who
produced as Identification, and who first being duly sworn, says that
he has read the
foregoing, and that all of the matters are true and correct, this November , 2013.
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA
Sworn and Subscribed before me this
EFTA01107606
SERVICE LIST
CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Jack Scarola, Es .
Searcy Denney Scarola et al.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Jack Goldber er, Es .
Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA
250 Australian Ave. South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Marc Nurik, Esq.
1 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.
Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman
425 N Andrews Avenue
Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Fred Haddad, Esq.
1 Financial Plaza
Suite 2612
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Ton'a Haddad Coleman, E uire
Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A.
315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
W. Chester Brewer, Jr.
One Clearlake Center
Suite 1400
250 Australian Avenue South
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
EFTA01107607
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 027e0d17-95ab-428c-8466-39265f68361f
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA01107603.pdf
- Content Hash
- 114b65d54c0ac36542e24219855fb7c2
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026